Are there any alternatives to court in an auto accident claim?
If you’re considering hiring an auto accident lawyer DC provides because you want to avoid a courtroom case, you’re not alone. At Cohen and Cohen, P.C., we know that many accident victims are interested in pursuing compensation for their injuries — but they definitely want to avoid the courtroom if at all possible.
Why avoid court?
There are a few reasons why it may be wise to bypass a court case in front of a judge or jury. First, a case presented in front of a judge or jury will likely take more time to prepare for and execute. Both the defendant and the plaintiff will likely have to travel to court more than once, and there’s no telling how long a hearing will last. This ultimately results in more legal fees and courtroom fees for both sides.
Additionally, an auto accident lawyer DC drivers trust might be wary of a courtroom decision because it is not very predictable. For an injured plaintiff, it’s possible that a jury could award a settlement that covers every penny of losses — but it’s also possible that a jury could deny compensation entirely. Furthermore, once the court has made its decision, that decision is final.
There are two popular alternatives to court for an injury claim: mediation and arbitration.
Mediation and Arbitration
Mediation might be the ideal route if the defendant and the plaintiff are willing to engage in an informal negotiation and are willing to accept the outcome. During mediation, a trained mediator may facilitate discussion between the insurance company and the injured plaintiff (or their auto accident lawyer in DC). A mediator will listen to each side of the case and will suggest a resolution at the conclusion of the discussion. The mediator is not allowed to enforce the suggestion, and one or both sides are able to reject the suggestion if they are unhappy with it.
Mediation can be a smart choice for plaintiffs who are nervous about going to court or are wary about entering a binding agreement before knowing the details of the agreement. Statements made during mediation are not admissible in court. This can encourage both sides to talk more freely without fear of saying something that could be used against them in court. If it’s not possible to reach an agreement, the parties may choose to take the matter to court.
Arbitration is another alternative, and it would be especially wise to hire an auto accident lawyer DC has to offer in the event of arbitration. This process still occurs outside the courtroom and can be much faster and cost-efficient than taking the matter to court. Unlike mediation, in arbitration, the professional arbitrator’s decision to settle the disagreement is binding. Arbitration guarantees a resolution — but it doesn’t always guarantee a favorable resolution. It’s essential to bolster a case with plenty of evidence to increase the chances of a favorable outcome.
Contact an Auto Accident Lawyer DC Residents Can Count On
If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, it’s important to know that there’s a local DC auto accident lawyer you can depend on. At Cohen and Cohen, P.C., we’re proud to serve the DC metro area and provide reliable counsel for personal injury cases.
For more information about car accident claims, or to speak with an auto accident lawyer DC trusts, contact Cohen and Cohen, P.C. today at 202-999-3230.